Assessment
of Phytochemical Screening, Antioxidant and Antibacterial Potential of the Methanolic Extract of Ricinus communis l.
Nidhi Rao1, Sandhya Mittal1*,
Sudhanshu1, and Ekta Menghani2
1Suresh Gyan Vihar University, Jaipur
2Mahatma Gandhi Institute of Applied Sciences, JECRC Campus, Jaipur-22. India
*Corresponding
Author E-mail: nidhiscorpian03@gmail.com
ABSTRACT:
The medicinal plants represent a massive
reservoir of probable microbial compounds that could be useful as a substitute
to synthetic microbicides as well as are being used
to develop drugs. In the present study, the powder extracts of Ricinus communis L. (Euphorbiaceae) were tested for their antioxidant activity
by radical scavenging activity using 1,1‐diphenyl‐2‐picrylhydrazyl
(DPPH) method and antibacterial acitivity against
different bacteria i.e. Shigella flexneri,
Staphylococcus aureus, Salmonella typhi,
Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Klebsiella
pneumonia, Proteus vulgaris, Enterobacter
aerogenes, Aspergillus niger, Candida albicans, Trichophyton rubrum by
disc diffusion method. Also, Phytochemical screening of methanolic
extracts of Ricinus communis
have been screened. Further, the antioxidant activity shows moderate to potent
antioxidant activity, with the ED50 value i.e. 0.838 μg/ml. When screening for antimicrobial
activity, the results were expressed in terms of the diameter of the inhibition
zone: The maximum efficacy of methanolic extract was
showed against Enterobacter and Aspergillus niger.
KEY
WORDS: Antioxidant activity, Antimicrobial activity, DPPH Scavenging, Ricinus communis.
INTRODUCTION:
Natural
history has been a source of remedial agents ever since times immemorial.
Though, the harmonizing components give the plant as entire a safety as well as
efficiency much finer to that of its isolated in addition to pure active
components1. There are numerous reports on the phytochemical
screening, antioxidant and antimicrobial activity of different herbal extracts
in different regions of the world2-5. As of the side effects and the
resistance that pathogenic microorganisms build against antibiotics, in recent
times much attention has been compensated to extracts and geologically active
compounds isolated from plant species which are used in herbal medicine6.
Roughly 20% of the plants found in the world have been submit to
pharmacological or biological test, furthermore a considerable number of new
antibiotics introduce on the market are obtained from natural or else
semi-synthetic resources7.
The fourth
largest family of the angiosperms i.e. Euphorbiaceae,
is comprising over 300 genera in addition to about 7500 species disseminated
widely in tropical Africa8. The euphorbiaceae
plants are shrubs, trees, herbs or else hardly ever lianas9. The
family provides food10 as well as diverse medicinal properties used
in ethnobotany11-14. For example, ricin
contained in Ricinus communis
is a well known toxic compound that elicits aggressive purgative accomplishment
in man15. The Castor oil
plant, Ricinus communis,
is a species of flowering plant in the spurge family, Euphorbiaceae.
It belongs to a monotypic genus, Ricinus, and subtribe, Ricininae. Its seed is
the castor bean which, despite its name, is not a true bean. Castor is
indigenous to the southeastern Mediterranean Basin, Eastern Africa, and India,
but is widespread throughout tropical regions (and widely grown elsewhere as an
ornamental plant). Castor seed is the source of castor oil, which has a wide
variety of uses. The seeds contain between 40% and 60%
oil that is rich in triglycerides, mainly ricinolein.
The seed contains ricin, a toxin, which is also
present in lower concentrations throughout the plant.
Thus
current study was worn to calculate the antioxidant potential of methanolic extract of Ricinus
communis. Plant extracts were tested for
different free radical scavenging activities including the 1,1-diphenyl
2-picryl hydrazyl (DPPH) and their total antioxidant
capacity. Also in this study, the drugs have been used owing to the various
bacterial infections. They have been screened for their antibacterial activity
against Shigella flexneri,
Staphylococcus aureus, Klebsiella
pneumonia, Proteus vulgaris, Enterobacter
aerogenes, Chryseobacteriu gleum, Bacillus subtilis and antifungal activity against Candida albicans, Aspergillus niger, Aspergillus fumigates, Aspergillus flavus. The crude
drug was the Ricinus communis
used as antimicrobial drug. The antimicrobial activity of this plant extract
was compared with standard antibacterial drug Tetracycline.
MATERIALS AND METHODS:
Collection:
Authentic
samples: Various market samples of Ricinus communis L. were procured from Chunnilal Attar Ayurvedic Store, Ghat Gate, Jaipur in the month of March,
2010.
Identification:
All the samples were authenticated and were
given identification number. The identification was as follows:
These samples were authenticated and
submitted in Ethnomedicinal Herbarium, Centre of
Excellence funded by DST, MGiaS, Jaipur
(Rajasthan).
Processing
of plant materials:
During the course of the study each sample
was screened for its foreign matter and milled, before use.
Experimental
details:
Present studies were performed on Ricinus communis
L.
for the following studies-.
1. Phytochemical test of plant extract
2. Antioxidant Potentials of Methanolic extract
of plant
3. Antimicrobial activity
1. PHYTOCHEMICAL SCREENING
Phytochemical screening was performed using
standard procedure:
TEST
FOR REDUCING SUGARS (FEHLINGS TEST)
The aqueous ethanol extract (0.5gm in 5 ml
of water) was added to boiling fehlings
solution (A and B) in a test tube. The solution was observed for a colour reaction.
TEST FOR TERPENOIDES (SALKOWSKI TEST)
To 0.5 gm each of the extract was added to
2ml of chloroform. Concentrated sulphuric acid (3ml)
was carefully added to form a layer. Reddish brown coloration of the interface
indicates the presence of terpenoides.
TEST FOR FLAVONOIDES
4ml of extract solution was treated with
1.5ml of 50% methanol solution. The solution was warmed and metal magnesium was
added. To this solution, 5-6 drops of concentrated Hydrochloride acid was added
and red colour was observed for flavonoids
and orange color for flavons.
TEST FOR TANNINS
About 0.5 g of the extract was boiled in
10ml of water in a test tube and then filtered. A few drops of 0.1% ferric
chloride was added and observed for brownish green or a blue-black coloration.
TEST FOR SAPONINS
To 0.5 g of extract was added 5 ml of
distilled water in a test tube. The solution was shaken vigorously. And observed for a stable persistent froth. The frothing was
mixed with 3 drops of olive oil and shaken vigorously after which it was
observed for the formation of an emulsion.
TEST FOR ALKALOIDS
Alkaloids solutions produce white yellowish
precipitate when a few drops of Mayers reagents are added. Most alkaloids are
precipitated from neutral or slightly acidic solution by Mayers regent.
The alcoholic extract was heated on a
boiling water bath with 2% hydrochloric acid. After cooling, the mixture was
filtered and treated with a few drops of mayers
reagent. The sample was then observed for the turbidity or yellow
precipitation.
2. ANTIOXIDANT ACTIVITY
Preparation of test extracts
All the test plant sample and their
adulterants were milled and refluxed in ethanol for 36 h, filtered,
concentrated to dryness in vacuo. A portion of
ethanolic extract was further successively extracted in pet. ether,
benzene, chloroform, alcohol and water, concentrated and stored at minimum
temperature, until used.
Preparation of DPPH
DPPH (1, 1'-diphenyl-2-picrylhydrazl, C18H12N5O6;
Hi media) 0.8 mg was dissolved in 10 ml methanol to obtain a concentration of
0.08 mg/ml for antioxidative (qualitative and
quantitative) assay.
Qualitative assay
Each
successive extract (10 mg) was dissolved in 10 ml of its suitable solvent to
get a concentration of 1 mg/ml and from this, 0.25΅l
was taken with the help of micropipette, applied on silica gel G coated plates.
These circular spots were sprayed with DPPH solution, allowed to stand for 30
min. When DPPH reacts with an antioxidant compound, which can donate hydrogen,
it is reduced, and the changes in colour (from deep-
violet to light- yellow on white) were recorded at 517 nm on a UV
spectrophotometer (Varian Cary PCB 150, Water Peltier
System).
Quantitative assay
A concentration of 1 mg/ml of ethanolic
extract of each test sample was prepared to obtain different concentrations (102΅g
to 10-3 ΅g/ ml).
Table 1: Showing phytochemical
screening results of Ricinus communis.
|
Ricinus communis L. |
||||||
|
TEST |
Reducing Sugar |
Saponin |
Tannin |
Terpenoides |
Flavonoides |
Alkaloides |
|
|
- |
+ |
-ve |
- |
-ve |
- |
Each diluted solution (2.5 ml each) was
mixed with DPPH (2.5ml). The samples were kept in the dark for 15 min at room
temperature and then the decrease in absorption was measured. Absorption of
blank sample containing the same amount of methanol and DPPH solution was
prepared and measured. The UV absorbance was recorded at 517 nm. The experiment
was done in triplicate and the average absorption was noted for each
concentration. Data were processed using EXCEL and concentration that cause 50%
reduction in absorbance (RC50) was calculated. The same procedure
was also followed for the standards- quercetin and
ascorbic acid.
3.
ANTIMICROBIAL ACTIVITY
Sources of
test organisms
Bacteria-Pure culture of all test
organisms, namely Pseudomonas aeruginosa,
Staphylococcus aureus, Klebsiella
pneumoniae, Salmonella typhi,
Shigella flexneri, Proteus vulgaris, Enterobactor aerogenes and fungi Candida albicans,
Aspergillus niger, Trichophyton rubrum were
obtained through the courtesy of Mahatma Gandhi Institute of applied
Sciences (MGiaS), Jaipur,
which were maintained on Nutrient broth media. Culture of test microbes:
For the cultivation of bacteria, Nutrient Agar Medium (NAM) was prepared
by using 20 g Agar, 5 g Peptone, 3 g beef extract and 3 g NaCl
in 1 L distilled water and sterilized at 15 lbs pressure and 121°C
temperature for 25-30 min. Agar test plates were prepared pouring
approximately 15 ml of NAM into the Petri dishes (10 mm) under aseptic
conditions. A saline solution was prepared (by mixing 0.8% NaCl)
in distilled water, followed by autoclaving and the bacterial\ cultures
were maintained on this medium by regular sub-culturing and incubation
at 37°C for 24-48 h. To prepare the test plates, in bacteria, 10-15 ml
of the respective medium was poured into the Petri plates and used for screening.
For assessing the bactericidal efficacy, a fresh suspension of the test
bacteria was prepared in saline solution from a freshly grown Agar slant.
Preparation
of test extracts
Crushed powder (50 g) of all the species
were successively soxhlet extracted with Methanol.
Later, the homogenates was filtered and the residue was re-extracted twice for
complete exhaustion, the extract was pooled. The filtrate was concentrated to
dryness in vitro and re dissolved in
respective solvents, out of which 80mg/10disc i.e. 8mg/disc concentration were
stored at 4°C in a refrigerator, until screened for antibacterial activity.
Bactericidal
assay
For both, bactericidal in vitro Disc diffusion method was adopted (Gould and Bowie, 1952),
because of reproducibility and precision. The different test organisms were
proceeded separately using a sterile swab over previously sterilized culture
medium plates and the zone of inhibition were measured around sterilized dried
discs of Whatman No.1 paper(6 mm in diameter), which were containing 8 mg of
the text extracts, its control (of the respective solvent) and tetracycline as
reference drugs(standard disk) separately. Such treated discs were air-dried at
room temperature to remove any residual solvent, which might interfere with the
determination, sterilized and inoculated. These plates were initially placed at
low temperature for 1 h so as to allow the maximum diffusion of the compounds
from the test disc into the agar plate and later, incubated at 37°C for 24 h in
case of bacteria, after which the zones of inhibition could be easily observed.
Five replicates of each test extract were examined and the mean values were
then referred.
The inhibition zone (IZ) in each case were
recorded and the activity index (AI) was calculated as compared with those of
their respective standard reference drugs (AI = Inhibition Zone of test sample
/ Inhibition zone of standard).
RESULTS AND
DISCUSSION:
1.
Phytochemical screening:
The phytochemical screening of Ricinus communis
as given in Table 1 shows
the occurrence of saponins whereas it shows the
absence of tannin and flavonoides respectively. The
screening of the Ricinus communis make only a a
small amount of differences in the constituent of the toughened plants. The
drug shows the confirmation of strong antioxidant activity in more or in a less
important amount. The existence of these compounds in this plant is credible to
be scrupulous for the free radical scavenging effects hardnosed.
2.
Antioxidant Activity:
Table
2: Showing Optical density of
Ricinus communis on different concentrations.
|
CONCENTRATION
(΅g/ml) |
O.D (nm) |
|
0.001 |
1.764 |
|
0.01 |
1.729 |
|
0.1 |
1.651 |
|
1 |
1.411 |
|
10 |
1.261 |
|
100 |
1.187 |
|
1000 |
1.117 |
In the present investigation it was showed
in Table 2 that the maximum optical density comes out to be 1.764 nm which is
at the concentration 10-3 ΅g/ml and the smallest optical density is
1.117 nm which is at the concentration 103 ΅g/ml where as the other
shows comparable O.D at different concentrations i.e. 1.729 nm at 10-2΅g/ml, 1.651
nm at 10-1 ΅g/ml, 1.411 nm at 1 ΅g/ml, 1.261 nm at 101
΅g/ml, 1.187 nm at 102
΅g/ml.
Fig
1: Graph showing Antioxidant Activity of Ricinus communis at different concentration.
Table
3: Showing Antibacterial activtiy of Ricinus communis on different concentrations.
|
Microorganisms |
Disc Concentration |
||||||
|
A(1mg/disc) |
B(5mg/disc) |
C(10mg/disc) |
Standard |
||||
|
Inhibition zone (in mm) |
Activity index (inhibition
zone/ standard |
Inhibition zone (in mm) |
Activity index (inhibition zone/ standard |
Inhibition zone (in mm) |
Activity index (inhibition zone/ standard |
||
|
Proteus vulgeris |
Nil |
Nil |
Nil |
Nil |
Nil |
Nil |
19 |
|
Cryseobacterium
galacum |
Nil |
Nil |
Nil |
Nil |
Nil |
Nil |
18 |
|
Staphylococcus aureus |
Nil |
Nil |
Nil |
Nil |
Nil |
Nil |
22 |
|
Enterobacter |
6 |
0.37 |
6 |
0.37 |
12 |
0.75 |
16 |
|
Klebsiella
pneumoniae |
Nil |
Nil |
Nil |
Nil |
Nil |
Nil |
14 |
|
Bacillus subtilis |
5 |
0.23 |
6 |
0.28 |
6 |
0.28 |
21 |
|
Shigella flexneri |
Nil |
Nil |
Nil |
Nil |
Nil |
Nil |
13 |
Fig 2: Graph showing Antibacterial Activity
of Ricinus communis
at different concentration.
Table 4: Showing Antifungal activity of Ricinus communis
on different concentrations.
|
Microorganisms |
Disc
concentrations |
||||||
|
A(1mg/disc) |
B(5mg/disc) |
C
(10mg/disc) |
Standard |
||||
|
Inhibition
zone (in mm) |
Activity
index (inhibition
zone/
standard |
Inhibition
zone (in mm) |
Activity
index (inhibition
zone/
standard |
Inhibition
zone (in mm) |
Activity
index |
|
|
|
Aspergillus niger |
17 |
1.06 |
16 |
1 |
9 |
0.56 |
16 |
|
A.fumigatus |
Nil |
Nil |
Nil |
Nil |
Nil |
Nil |
19 |
|
A. flavus |
Nil |
Nil |
Nil |
Nil |
Nil |
Nil |
9 |
|
Candida |
Nil |
Nil |
Nil |
Nil |
Nil |
Nil |
12 |
Fig 3: Graph showing Antifungal Activity of
Ricinus communis
at different concentration.
In the present investigations, Fig 1 shows
the antioxidant activity of Ricinus communis which showed appreciable activity against the DPPH assay
method where the regression line clear cut showed the effectiveness of it as
its have potentials which are comparable to ascorbic acid. The antioxidant
activity of Ricinus communis in methanolic extract using DPPH
assay method shows appreciable activity comparable to standard ascorbic acid.
The straight line showed y=-0.182x+1.776 and regression=0.838 whereas, in above
drug the straight line is y =-0.122x+1.933 and regression = 0.959.
3.
Antimicrobial Activity:
Ψ Antibacterial activity of Ricinus communis:
Table 3 showing the the alcoholic extract showing antibacterial activity
against Enterobacter
sps. and Bacillus
subtilis microorganisms, expect Klebsiella pneumonia, P. vulgaris,
Cryseobacterium galacum,
and Shigella flexneri
has no activity.
Ψ Antifungal activity of Ricinus communis:
When antifungal
activity of Ricinus communis was performed against above four fungus it was found that activity was appreciable but showed
positive activity against Aspergillus niger as shown in Table 4.
CONCLUSION:
From the above results and discussion it
can be accomplished that the methanolic extract of Ricinus communis possesses the effectual antioxidant and
antimicrobial substances and a which may be rationalize on the basis of using
this plants extract as folkloric remedies. The noteworthy test systems i.e. wholly free radical scavenging
next to with reducing power, were used for the chemical analysis. In the current study it indicates that the saponins are present in
Ricinus communis. The occurrence of saponins
in huge quantity is rationally proportional to the antioxidant activity so it
is evidently show that it will prove the antioxidant activity and promote a
drug for treatment of various infectious disease.
Further, the results of antibacterial activity were quite good, Enterobacter and Bacillus subtilis showed very good results Whereas antifungal activity of Ricinus communis was found that
activity was appreciable but showed positive activity against Aspergillus niger.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT:
Author acknowledge with thanks the
financial support from Department of Science and Technology, Government of
Rajasthan, in the form of Centre with Potentials for Excellence in
Biotechnology, sanction no F 7(17) (9) Wipro/Gaprio/2006/7358-46(31/10/2008).
REFERENCES:
1.
Shariff, Z.U.
(2001). Chemical composition and antimicrobial activity of the essential oils
from the gum of Turkish Pistachio (Pistacia vera L.) J. Agric Food Chem.
Jun 6: 52(12): 3911 3914.
2.
Chung
PY, Chung LY, Ngeow YF et al., 2004. Antimicrobial
activities of Malaysian plant species. Pharm Bio 42:
292 300.
3.
Nair
R, Chanda SV., 2004.
Antibacterial activity of some medicinal plants of Saurashtra
region. J. Jissue Res 4: 117 120.
4.
De N, Ifeoma, E (2002). Antimicrobial effects of components of
the bark extracts of Neem. J. Technol. Dev., 8: 23
28.
5.
Nair
R, Kalariya T, Chanda S.,
2005. Antibacterial activity of some selected Indian medicinal flora. Turk J Biol 29: 41 47.
6.
Essawi T, Srour M., 2000. Screening of some palestnian
medicinal plants for antibacterial activity J Ethnopharmacol 70: 343 349.
7.
Mothana,
R.A., Lindequist, U., 2005. Antimicrobial activity of
some medicinal plants of the island soqotra. J.Ethnopharmacol.,
96: 177 181.
8.
Gill,
L.S. 1988. Taxonomy of flowering plants, Africana Feb publishers Ltd., Nigeria.
9.
Pandey,
B.P., (2006). A textbook of Botany: Angiosperms, Taxonomy, Anatomy, Embryology
and Economic Botany, S. Chand and Co., Ltd., Ram
Nagar, New Delhi.
10. Etukudo, I. 2003. Ethnobotany:
Conventional and traditional uses of plants, verdict Press, Ugo,
Akwa Ibom, Nigeria.
11. Vasishta, P.C 1974 Taxonomy of Angiosperms 2nd
ed. R. Chand and Co. New Delhi.
12. Agbovie, T., Amponsah,
K., Crentsil, O.R., Dennis, F. Odamtten,
G.T. and ofusohene - Djan
W. 2002. Conservation and sustainable use of medicine plants in Ghana, Ethnobotanical Survey, UNEP WCMC, Cambridge, UK.
13. Betti, J.L. 2004, An ethnobotanical
study of medicinal plants among the Baka pygmies in
the Dja Biospher Reserve,
Cameroon, Africa Study Monographs 25(1) : 1-27.
14. Kubmarawa, D., Ajoku, G.a. Eniverem, N.M and Okorie, D.A 2007 Preliminary Phytochemical and
antimicrobial screening of 50 medicing plants from
Nigeria, African J. Biotechnilogy 6(14): 1690 1696.
Pandery, B.P. 2006. A text book of Bofancy: Angiosperms, Taxonomy, Anatomy, Embryology and
Economic Botany, S.Chand and Co., Ltd., Ram Nagar,
New Delhi.
15. Trease, G.F and Evans, W.C. 2002. Pharmacognosy,
15th Ed. Saunders.
Received on 03.12.2012 Accepted on 25.12.2012
© Asian Pharma
Press All Right Reserved
Asian J. Pharm.
Tech. 3(1): Jan.-Mar. 2013;
Page 20-25